1952 Topps Mickey Mantle #311

1 / 2
Mickey Mantle
💬

Reviews & Discussions

5 total reviews

p_baseball_14
p_baseball_14 COUNCIL B 8/21/2025

Centering and tilt should be variables that weigh a lot more in the third party grading equation. In the realm of real live collectors choosing the cards they find best, centering and tilt are major factors. For lots of us, more than corners. In the case study of this card, centering and tilt should have brought it down in grade. Luckily here I can say they do indeed affect the eye appeal. This hits my eye as average despite the corners, precisely because the image is tilted and off-centered.

spacebearcards
spacebearcards COUNCIL B- 8/21/2025

This copy shows very well for a 1952 Topps. The corners are remarkably sharp, and the print registration is crisp, giving the image a strong, clean look. The centering is better than most examples of this card, though a slight tilt and some off-centering keep it from being truly A tier. There is also some yellowing in the blue background and across the hands, which is noticeable but not overwhelming. Overall, it is a highly respectable example with strong visual appeal, worthy of a solid B-, and perhaps closer to an B in low lighting.

dchase
dchase COUNCIL A- 8/21/2025

Colors are bright and bold, centering is off but an incredible card

mrreality68
mrreality68 COUNCIL A 8/4/2025

colors and image really POPs. off center on top and bottom. But great looking cards

mattyc_collection
mattyc_collection COUNCIL B- 7/27/2025

As sharp as this card is, looking at that tilted centering every day would bother my eye and seek me to find a more evenly framed example for my collection.

B
5 reviews
Unknown Community Rating
0 reviews

EyeQ+

--
Global Population
95
POPULATION ACROSS ALL GRADES AND GRADING COMPANIES
Global Eye Rank
—
No Eye Q+ score
Population in Grade
4
POPULATION IN THIS GRADE ACROSS ALL GRADING COMPANIES
Eye Rank in Grade
—
No Eye Q+ score

EYEQ+ TROPHY CASE

No Global Trophy
GLOBAL
No In-Grade Trophy
IN-GRADE
Trophies appear here when earned.
📊

Rating Distribution

5 total reviews

G
0%
A+
0%
A
1 rating
20%
1
A-
1 rating
20%
1
B+
0%
B
1 rating
20%
1
B-
2 ratings
40%
2
C+
0%
C
0%
C-
0%
D+
0%
D
0%
D-
0%
F
0%