1952 Topps Mickey Mantle #311
1 / 2
💬
Reviews & Discussions
5 total reviews
Large piece missing and significant creasing and wear. Would not qualify for a numerical grade from my standpoint with that much missing from a corner.
looks like some one tried to take a bite out of Mantle and even though I am not to concerned about corners when a chunk is missing that bothers me. THe card itself is faded and speckled and creased. From a distance it presents pretty well but when looking close at it it becomes very noticeable and bother some
5 reviews
0 reviews
EyeQ+
--
Global Population
95
POPULATION ACROSS ALL GRADES AND GRADING COMPANIES
Global Eye Rank
—
No Eye Q+ score
Population in Grade
73
POPULATION IN THIS GRADE ACROSS ALL GRADING COMPANIES
Eye Rank in Grade
—
No Eye Q+ score
EYEQ+ TROPHY CASE

GLOBAL

IN-GRADE
Trophies appear here when earned.
📊
Rating Distribution
5 total reviews
G
0%
A+
0%
A
0%
A-
0%
B+
0%
B
0%
B-
0%
C+
0%
C
0%
C-
0%
D+
1 rating
20%
1
D
1 rating
20%
1
D-
0%
F
3 ratings
60%
3
Ah, the 1952 Mantle is a card that usually inspires awe. Its flaws include a significant missing piece, unfortunate centering, numerous creases, and faded colors. Collectively, they render it more a piece of historical sympathy than a showcase piece. In essence, it is a rather sorrowful rendition of a legendary card.